Today, we filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction against the Florida Medical Boards and Florida Surgeon General, asking the Court for an emergency order blocking the enforcement of the discriminatory bans on gender-affirming healthcare for trans youth in Florida.

When U.S. District Judge Beth Bloom denied the City of Miami’s motion to dismiss in Cooper-Levy v. City of Miami Dec. 6, Southern Legal Counsel and co-counsel crossed the first major hurdle in their federal lawsuit against the city over its practice of seizing and destroying homeless people's property.

Seeking to secure a Florida high-school student’s educational rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Southern Legal Counsel and Three Rivers Legal Services filed a federal complaint against the student’s local school board.

DAYTONA BEACH, FL – Southern Legal Counsel, along with pro bono attorneys Sabarish Neelakanta of SPN Law and Paul George of Holland & Knight, filed a federal lawsuit challenging a Daytona Beach ordinance that prohibits asking for donations in certain public spaces.

Learn more about the rules being promulgated by the Florida Boards of Medicine and Osteopathic Medicine to restrict access to treatment for gender dysphoria for minors in the state of Florida. Learn what you can do to get involved today!

Today, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), the Legal Defense Fund (LDF), and Southern Legal Counsel (SLC) filed a lawsuit against the Pasco County Sheriff’s Office on behalf of the nonprofit civil rights organization, the Council on American-Islamic Relations-Florida (CAIR-FL). The lawsuit argues that the Pasco County Sheriff Office’s refusal to provide demographic information about its predictive policing program targeting students is a violation of the Florida Public Records Act.

Recognizing they were likely to lose a potentially costly legal fight, City of Lake Worth Beach officials repealed two ordinances at the center of a federal lawsuit Southern Legal Counsel and West Palm Beach pro bono attorney Sabarish P. Neelakanta of SPN Law filed in June.

The lawsuit challenged the city’s enforcement of local ordinances that unlawfully prohibited public charitable solicitation, which is protected speech under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

LGBTQ+ and health advocacy groups Southern Legal Counsel, Lambda Legal, Florida Health Justice Project, and National Health Law Program, together with international law firm Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, filed a federal lawsuit today challenging Florida’s anti-transgender health care rule denying coverage for transgender Medicaid beneficiaries’ medically necessary gender-affirming medical care. The lawsuit, Dekker, et al., v. Marstiller, et al., Case No. 4:22-cv-00325-RH-MAF (Hinkle, J.), was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida against the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA), on behalf of four plaintiffs.

Florida House Bill 1557, commonly referred to as the “Don’t Say Gay” law, which bans discussion of sexual orientation and gender identity in grades K-3 and restricts such discussions for students through grade 12 based on undefined standards of appropriateness.

“Ignoring thousands of public comments and expert testimony, Florida’s AHCA has finalized a rule that will deny Medicaid coverage for all medically necessary gender-affirming care for both youth and adults. This discriminatory and medically unsound rule will take effect on August 21, 2022, putting transgender people in jeopardy of losing access to critical gender-affirming health care services.

“Southern Legal Counsel, Florida Health Justice Project, Lambda Legal, and National Health Law Program urge the Florida Board of Medicine to stop playing politics with people’s health care and not to adopt guidelines for a standard of care to treat gender dysphoria that are contrary to the evidence-based and overwhelming consensus that gender-affirming medical care for the treatment of gender dysphoria is safe, effective, and medically necessary.”

The lawsuit argues that the law, which bans discussion of sexual orientation and gender identity in grades K-3 and restricts such discussions for students through grade 12 based on undefined standards of appropriateness, effectively silences and erases LGBTQ+ students and families. The law demands that school districts implement its terms, and it empowers any parent to directly sue the school district if they are dissatisfied with its implementation of the law.